Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4974
| Protocol |
1 Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2 Human Cancer Genetics Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3Corresponding author (mestecio{at}mdanderson.org)
INTRODUCTION
This protocol describes the use of methylated CpG island amplification (MCA) in combination with a microarray platform to analyze genome-wide DNA methylation in a high-throughput fashion. In this approach, termed MCAM, methylated CpG islands are selectively targeted using oligonucleotide adaptors after two rounds of digestion with a combination of methylation-sensitive and methylation-insensitive nucleases. They are then amplified using PCR. The resulting amplicons, representing the methylated fraction of the genome, are labeled with fluorochromes. Subsequently, a comparative hybridization of reference and test samples (typically normal and tumor DNA specimens) is done on a microarray platform.
RELATED INFORMATION
This protocol has been tested in cancer cell lines and primary tumors (Estécio et al. 2007). Validation experiments by bisulfite-PCR (considered to be the gold standard) of fifteen genes in three cancer lines and eleven primary colorectal carcinomas revealed sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 96%, respectively. Additionally, MCAM could detect methylation differences of as little as 10% between tumor and normal adjacent paired colon samples.
MATERIALS
Reagents
Agarose gel (1.5%)
Cot-1DNA (human; Invitrogen)
Cy3-dCTP and Cy5-dCTP (GE Healthcare)
dNTP mix (25 mM)
Ethanol (prechilled to 4°C for Step 23)
Genomic DNA
Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I
The best source for this exonuclease at 40 units/µL is the Bioprime DNA Labeling System (Invitrogen).
MCAM wash solution 2
SSC (20X) is diluted 100-fold in H2O to prepare this wash solution, which is 0.2X SSC.
Oligonucleotide primers:
We have developed two different sets of primers (RMCA and RXMA) that differ in CG content and represent slightly different subsets of CpG islands. On average, the RMCA primers amplify smaller and more CG rich fragments than RXMA. Some probes work well using either condition, but others work better (or exclusively) using only one of the sets of primers. In our experience, the use of either set of primers for MCAM resulted in similar sensitivity and specificity. For this reason, one set of primers per experiment can be successfully used to reveal global patterns of methylation.
PCR Purification kit (QIAquick kit; Qiagen)
Phenol:chloroform (1.5:1 [v/v]; pH 9.0)
Prehybridization solution for MCAM
Restriction enzymes: SmaI and XmaI
SDS hybridization solution (2X; Genisphere)
Sodium acetate (3 M)
T4 DNA ligase and 10X ligase buffer
Taq DNA polymerase
Equipment
Beaker (large)
Centrifugal filter unit (e.g., Microcon YM-30; Millipore)
Centrifuge (benchtop)
Coverslips
Dishes (slide staining)
Electrophoresis equipment for 1.5% agarose gel
Hot plate
Hybridization chamber (e.g., HybChamber Mica, Genomic Solutions)
Ice
Incubator preset to 42°C
Microarray slides
Microcentrifuge
PCR equipment
Rack (for slides)
Rocker platform
Scanner and software (e.g., Genepix 4000B scanner and GenepixPro 6.0 software; Axon Instruments)
Spectrophotometer
Tubes (1.7-mL microcentrifuge)
Vortexer
Water bath preset to 60°C
Water baths or heat blocks preset to 16°C, 25°C, 37°C, 65°C, 95°C, and 100°C
METHOD
Figure 1 presents an overview of the MCAM method.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the MCAM method. Enrichment for methylated DNA and reduction of genome complexity is achieved by serial digestion with SmaI (methylation sensitive) and XmaI (methylation sensitive) restriction enzymes, followed by ligation of adaptors and PCR amplification. The resulting amplicons, representative of the methylated fraction of tumor and normal cells, are labeled and cohybridized in a microarray platform. Image acquisition and data analysis allow identification of methylated and nonmethylated genes by comparing intensity values of Cy5 and Cy3 dyes for each pair of tumor and control samples.
|
This method was adapted from an original protocol by Toyota et al. (1999). An online version is also available at http://www.mdanderson.org/departments/methylation/.
|
|
DMSO is not needed with RXMA primers.
Typically, four MCA reactions per tested sample are necessary to generate enough PCR product for labeling.
| ||||||||||||||
Labeling Amplicons and Slide Hybridization
This hybridization protocol is optimized for the Human CpG-island 12K Array (HCGI12K) from University Health Network (www.microarrays.ca).
|
|
Typically, Cy5-dCTP mix is used for tumor DNA and Cy3-dCTP is used for normal (reference) DNA.
DISCUSSION
The MCAM protocol was optimized using an array containing 12,192 CpG-island clones from the Sanger Institute (Cross et al. 1994; Heisler et al. 2005). However, this method can be applied to other array platforms, such as oligo, tiling, and custom-made arrays with larger gene representation. Our method compares favorably to other published methylation microarray protocols because it provides reproducible results with a high validation rate and demonstrated use in clinical samples for clustering cases into distinct molecular groups. In our experience, the sensitivity of methods to isolate DNA using 5-mC antibodies and methyl binding domain proteins is low, which limits their application in genome-wide studies (Weber et al. 2005; Rauch et al. 2006). The use of methylation-sensitive enzymes with frequent cutting sites, for example, HpaII/MspI (Hatada et al. 2006), results in a high genome fraction for amplification. In such highly complex circumstances, PCR efficiency is compromised and likely favors amplification of non-CpG island DNA. In comparison, our MCAM technique simultaneously reduces complexity and increases specificity by targeting methylated CpG islands before amplification.
A limitation of our method is that the generation of MCA amplicons depends on the presence of two SmaI sites in relatively close proximity (no more than 1-2 kb apart), which occurs in around 80% of the promoter CpG islands, as calculated from in silico digestion of the human genome. Also, differences in CG content make certain sequences more difficult to amplify in MCA and decrease hybridization efficiency, which may explain the presence of false-positive and false-negative data in MCAM. Despite these limitations, the low rate of false-positive data makes MCAM valuable in large-scale investigations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants P50CA100632, RO1CA098006, and R33CA89837.
REFERENCES
Cross, S.H., Charlton, J.A., Nan, X., and Bird, A.P. 1994. Purification of CpG islands using a methylated DNA binding column. Nat Genet. 6: 236–244.[Medline]
Estécio, M.R., Yan, P.S., Ibrahim, A.E., Tellez, C.S., Shen, L., Huang, T.H., and Issa, J.P. 2007. High-throughput methylation profiling by MCA coupled to CpG island microarray. Genome Res. 17: 1529–1536.
Hatada, I., Fukasawa, M., Kimura, M., Morita, S., Yamada, K., Yoshikawa, T., Yamanaka, S., Endo, C., Sakurada, A., Sato, M., et al. 2006. Genome-wide profiling of promoter methylation in human. Oncogene 25: 3059–3064.[Medline]
Heisler, L.E., Torti, D., Boutros, P.C., Watson, J., Chan, C., Winegarden, N., Takahashi, M., Yau, P., Huang, T.H., Farnham, P.J., et al. 2005. CpG Island microarray probe sequences derived from a physical library are representative of CpG Islands annotated on the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 2952–2961.
Rauch, T., Li, H., Wu, X., and Pfeifer, G.P. 2006. MIRA-assisted microarray analysis, a new technology for the determination of DNA methylation patterns, identifies frequent methylation of homeodomain-containing genes in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66: 7939–7947.
Toyota, M., Ho, C., Ahuja, N., Jair, K.W., Li, Q., Ohe-Toyota, M., Baylin, S.B., and Issa, J.P. 1999. Identification of differentially methylated sequences in colorectal cancer by methylated CpG island amplification. Cancer Res. 59: 2307–2312.
Weber, M., Davies, J.J., Wittig, D., Oakeley, E.J., Haase, M., Lam, W.L., and Schubeler, D. 2005. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37: 853–862.[Medline]
Related Article
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Online ISSN: 1559-6095 Terms of Service |