Please cite as: CSH Protocols; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4923

This Protocol
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow DNA Sequencing
Right arrow Genomic DNA
Right arrow Libraries
Right arrow Libraries, general
Right arrow Genomic Libraries
Right arrow Genome Analysis
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrow Bioinformatics/Genomics, general
Right arrow Genetics, general
Right arrow Genetic Variation
Right arrowRelated Protocols
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Legend icon

protocolProtocol

Whole-Genome Amplification by Single-Cell Comparative Genomic Hybridization PCR (SCOMP)

Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done

This protocol was adapted from "PCR-Based Whole Genome Amplification," Chapter 18, in PCR (eds. Hughes and Moody). Scion Publishing Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.


INTRODUCTION

PCR-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) has the goal of generating microgram quantities of genome-representative DNA from picogram or nanogram amounts of starting material. This amplification should introduce little, or ideally no, representational bias. In contrast to other techniques for WGA, PCR-based methods are generally less affected by DNA quality and are more applicable to DNA extracted from various sources (fixed and fresh tissues). Ligation-mediated PCR techniques involve ligating an adaptor sequence onto a "representation" of DNA molecules, generated following enzymatic digestion, random shearing, or chemical cleavage. Single-cell comparative genomic hybridization (SCOMP), described in this protocol, is a form of ligation-mediated PCR that was specifically designed for WGA of extremely limited sources of genomic DNA. The reaction volume is purposely kept to a minimum, and all buffers are optimized to eliminate the need to purify the reaction between steps. In addition, the entire reaction is performed in a single tube. This avoids initial template loss and reduces the risk of PCR contamination. SCOMP begins by converting the genome to a high-complexity representation with a fragment size of <2 kb by digesting with the restriction enzyme MseI. This results in a smear in the range of 100-1500 bp. Following enzyme digestion, adaptors containing specific primer sequences (specific to the restriction enzyme used) are ligated onto the ends of the genomic DNA and amplified in a high-stringency PCR. This results in a smear of PCR products in the range of 100-1500 bp, which can be visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis.


RELATED INFORMATION

When implementing WGA in the laboratory, it is important to assess the entire experimental process closely, including sample collection, fixation, storage, and initial DNA extraction procedures, as all of these factors can affect DNA quality and thus have some bearing on the selection of the WGA technique. When using WGA, it is important first to validate the method selected and to become proficient in the technique before applying it to actual samples. Irrespective of the method selected, it is essential to establish that the results generated from the amplified DNA are indistinguishable from the results obtained from the original genomic DNA.

The DNA that can be amplified by PCR-based WGA includes DNA extracted from fixed, frozen, or archival tissue; whole blood; buccal swabs; single cells; sorted chromosomes; and laser-capture microdissected tissue (for microdissection of tissues embedded in paraffin, the sections must be deparaffinized prior to microdissection). Genomic DNA may be extracted using a variety of commercially available methods such as the QIAmp DNA mini-kit (QIAGEN). Fixation of tissues can introduce sequence variations and reduce overall DNA quality. When studying such tissues, prior examination of the DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis will help determine the DNA quality. The amplified DNA produced is suitable for a range of downstream genetic assays and thus has the potential for use not only in academic research, but also in commercial, forensic, and diagnostic laboratories.

SCOMP was first reported by Klein et al. (1999) for the genetic analysis of single cells. For more information about genetic analysis using genomic representation, see Lucito et al. (1998). Protocols for Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG), and GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification are also available.


MATERIALS

Reagents

Agarose (Sigma)

ATP (Roche)

DNA size marker (100-bp ladder; Invitrogen)

dNTP mix (10 mM; 2.5 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP) (Invitrogen)

caution Ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL; Sigma)

Expand Long Template PCR system (3.5 U/µL; Roche)

This includes Expand Long Template Buffer 1 and Expand Long Template Polymerase. Other PCR systems designed for high-fidelity PCR may be used in this protocol but have not been tested.

Genomic DNA (5 ng/µL)

If purified genomic DNA is used, the concentration can be in the range of 10-100 ng/mL.

H2O (nuclease-free; Promega)

MseI (20 U/µL; New England Biolabs)

Oligonucleotides:

ddMse11 (5'-TAACTGACAGCdd-3') (100 µM)

LIB1 (5'-AGTGGGATTCCTGCTGTCAGT-3') (100 µM)

One-Phor-All Buffer Plus (GE Healthcare)

Orange loading dye (6X; Fermentas)

QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN)

T4 DNA ligase (5 U/µL; Roche)

recipe TBE buffer (1X diluted from a 10X stock at pH 8; may also be obtained from Sigma)

Equipment

Electrophoresis apparatus

Heating block or water bath preset to 37°C and 65°C

Microcentrifuge

Pipettes for mixing solutions

Spectrophotometer

Thermal cycler

Ultracentrifuge


METHOD

Prepare at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied.

Restriction Enzyme Digestion of Template Genomic DNA

If several SCOMP reactions are going to be generated for subsequent analysis (i.e., more than 2-3 µg is required), perform a larger volume digestion (Step 1), and aliquot it prior to Step 5.

1. Combine the following reagents:
0.2 µL One-Phor-All Buffer Plus
0.2 µL MseI
3 µL DNA template
Add nuclease-free H2O to a final reaction volume of 5 µL.

The 3 µL of template can be added directly after proteinase K inactivation without any purification. This is useful if the DNA has been laser-capture microdissected or when the entire amount of template is expected to be extremely limited (<100 ng).
A negative control using 3 µL of purified H2O should also be used to monitor for contamination. If desired, a positive control using 10 ng of good-quality genomic DNA may also be used to monitor successful PCR. See Troubleshooting.

2. Mix well by pipetting up and down, and incubate for 3 h at 37°C.

3. Inactivate the MseI by incubating the reaction for 5 min at 65°C.

4. Consolidate the reaction mixture by centrifuging at 12,000g for 10-20 sec.

SCOMP Adaptor Ligation

5. Prepare adaptor complexes by combining the following reagents:
0.5 µL One-Phor-All Buffer Plus
0.5 µL LIB1 oligonucleotide
0.5 µL ddMse11 oligonucleotide
Add nuclease-free H2O to a final reaction volume of 3 µL.

Prepare an adaptor for each sample from Step 4, including the negative control.

6. To form the adaptor complexes, incubate the sample using a step-down program on a thermal cycler going from 65°C to 15°C, ramping at 1°C/min.

7. Leaving the samples at 15°C, add to each reaction:
1 µL ATP
1 µL T4 DNA ligase

8. Add the total volume (5 µL) of the MseI-digested genomic DNA (from Step 4), and mix well by pipetting up and down.

9. Incubate overnight (~12-16 h) at 15°C.

10. Centrifuge the reactions in a microcentrifuge to collect the droplets formed by evaporation.

SCOMP PCR Amplification

11. Prepare a PCR master mix with the following reagents for each reaction from Step 10, including the negative control:
4 µL Expand Long Template Buffer 1
2 µL dNTP mix
1 µL Expand Long Template Polymerase
Add nuclease-free H2O to a final reaction volume of 40 µL.

12. Add 40 µL of the PCR master mix to the ligated genomic DNA fragments from Step 10 and place in a thermal cycler with the following three-stage combined program:
i. Stage 1: Initial incubation for 3 min at 68°C , followed by 15 cycles of denaturation for 40 sec at 94°C, annealing for 30 sec at 57°C, and elongation for 1 min, 30 sec at 68°C with an increment of 1 sec/cycle.
The initial incubation at 68°C (Stage 1) is required to fill in the recessive 3'-end of the lower DNA strand to generate a complementary primer sequence.

ii. Stage 2: Eight cycles of denaturation for 40 sec at 94°C, annealing for 30 sec at 57°C with an increment of 1°C/cycle, and elongation for 1 min, 45 sec at 68°C with an increment of 1 sec/cycle.

iii. Stage 3: 22 cycles of denaturation for 40 sec at 94°C, annealing for 30 sec at 65°C, and elongation for 1 min, 30 sec at 68°C with an increment of 1 sec/cycle, followed by a final extension for 3 min, 40 sec at 68°C.
The thermal cycler program was provided by Dr. C. Klein (Klein et al. 1999). Further optimization of these cycling parameters has not been tested.

Assessment, Cleaning, and Quantification of PCR Products

13. Determine the size of the products from Step 12 as follows:
i. Mix 5 µL of the reaction mix with 1 µL of 6X orange loading dye solution.

ii. Resolve the aliquot by Agarose Gel Electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing 20 µg of ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) per 100 mL of agarose, beside a DNA size marker.
Ideally, fragments generated from a good-quality genomic DNA sample should range from 100 to 1500 bp. The more degraded the original genomic DNA sample, the smaller the PCR fragments will be. The negative-control lane should be free of any product formation.
See Troubleshooting.
14. Clean each sample using the QIAquick PCR purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, but elute the PCR products in 50 µL of H2O.
If higher concentrations are required for downstream applications, the elution volume can be decreased from 50 to 30 µL, as recommended by QIAGEN.

15. Quantify the products using spectrophotometry.
See Troubleshooting.


TROUBLESHOOTING

Problem: There is amplification in the negative control.

[Step 13.ii]

Solution: Due to the manipulation of PCR products in all PCR-based WGA methods, the reactions can easily be contaminated. If negative controls produce a DNA smear, several steps can be tried to eliminate this:

Problem: Unpredictable amplification is observed.

[Step 13.ii]

Solution: A positive control (such as starting with 50 ng of good-quality genomic DNA) can be used to ensure that the reaction is working optimally. In addition:

Problem: The amplification smear contains smaller DNA fragments than expected.

[Step 13.ii]

Solution: The efficiency of amplification is dependent on the quality of the starting DNA, and the size of the amplification products is also template-dependent. Tissue fixation causes degradation of template DNA within the sample. If the template is degraded, as is DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, the smear will be smaller in size. Unfortunately, there is no way of improving this; thus care must be taken when using such products for downstream applications, because there may be more bias in these samples. Although PCR-based WGA is tolerant to mild or moderate DNA degradation and will amplify DNA with an average length of ~200 bp, in this case it is essential to use increased quantities of starting DNA (100 ng) to guarantee a satisfactory yield of final product. Moderate to severe degradation will reduce WGA efficiency and subsequently decrease the quality of results obtained in downstream applications.

Problem: There is insufficient DNA for downstream reactions.

[Step 15]

Solution: Combining at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied is recommended, as this has produced better results in downstream experiments.

Problem: Unpredictable results are obtained from downstream applications.

Solution: Successful PCR-based WGA and successful downstream results depend on the quality of starting DNA. For instance, if there is ineffective PCR amplification of a specific control gene with nonamplified DNA, negative results after WGA are to be expected. If using laser-capture microdissected material, a standard control PCR and a PCR using DNA from non-laser-capture microdissected tissue should be performed prior to WGA. In some cases, it may be necessary to try different amounts of amplified DNA in downstream PCR amplification procedures, for example, 12, 25, 50, and 100 ng.


DISCUSSION

The PCR products resulting from SCOMP have been used for several downstream applications, including chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) (Klein et al. 1999), array CGH (Ghazani et al. 2006), loss of heterozygosity (Klein et al. 1999) analysis, and direct sequencing (Klein et al. 1999). Both chromosomal CGH and array CGH analysis require the SCOMP products to be labeled in an additional reaction with appropriate dyes. When using SCOMP products for a comparative analysis (test and control), it is essential to treat both the DNA of interest and the control genomic DNA in the same manner. Because SCOMP reduces the genome to only a representation, it is important that control DNA is also a representation and that the control DNA be of similar quality to the DNA of interest. For example, if the DNA of interest was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, then the control "normal" DNA should also be from this source and preferably from the same patient. Pooling several replicate SCOMP reactions from the same sample may also help to reduce any bias that may be introduced in the PCR amplification step.


REFERENCES

Ghazani, A.A., Arneson, N.C., Warren, K., and Done, S.J. 2006. Limited tissue fixation times and whole genome amplification do not impact array CGH profiles. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 311–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Klein, C.A., Schmidt-Kittler, O., Schardt, J.A., Pantel, K., Speicher, M.R., and Riethmüller, G. 1999. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 4494–4499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lucito, R., Nakimura, M., West, J.A., Han, Y., Chin, K., Jensen, K., McCombie, R., Gray, J.W., and Wigler, M. 1998. Genetic analysis using genomic representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 4487–4492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Protocols

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4020. [Extract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4919. [Abstract] [Full Text]

GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4920. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4921. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4922. [Abstract] [Full Text]