Please cite as: CSH Protocols; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4923
| Protocol |
This protocol was adapted from "PCR-Based Whole Genome Amplification," Chapter 18, in PCR (eds. Hughes and Moody). Scion Publishing Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.
INTRODUCTION
PCR-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) has the goal of generating microgram quantities of genome-representative DNA from picogram or nanogram amounts of starting material. This amplification should introduce little, or ideally no, representational bias. In contrast to other techniques for WGA, PCR-based methods are generally less affected by DNA quality and are more applicable to DNA extracted from various sources (fixed and fresh tissues). Ligation-mediated PCR techniques involve ligating an adaptor sequence onto a "representation" of DNA molecules, generated following enzymatic digestion, random shearing, or chemical cleavage. Single-cell comparative genomic hybridization (SCOMP), described in this protocol, is a form of ligation-mediated PCR that was specifically designed for WGA of extremely limited sources of genomic DNA. The reaction volume is purposely kept to a minimum, and all buffers are optimized to eliminate the need to purify the reaction between steps. In addition, the entire reaction is performed in a single tube. This avoids initial template loss and reduces the risk of PCR contamination. SCOMP begins by converting the genome to a high-complexity representation with a fragment size of <2 kb by digesting with the restriction enzyme MseI. This results in a smear in the range of 100-1500 bp. Following enzyme digestion, adaptors containing specific primer sequences (specific to the restriction enzyme used) are ligated onto the ends of the genomic DNA and amplified in a high-stringency PCR. This results in a smear of PCR products in the range of 100-1500 bp, which can be visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis.
RELATED INFORMATION
When implementing WGA in the laboratory, it is important to assess the entire experimental process closely, including sample collection, fixation, storage, and initial DNA extraction procedures, as all of these factors can affect DNA quality and thus have some bearing on the selection of the WGA technique. When using WGA, it is important first to validate the method selected and to become proficient in the technique before applying it to actual samples. Irrespective of the method selected, it is essential to establish that the results generated from the amplified DNA are indistinguishable from the results obtained from the original genomic DNA.
The DNA that can be amplified by PCR-based WGA includes DNA extracted from fixed, frozen, or archival tissue; whole blood; buccal swabs; single cells; sorted chromosomes; and laser-capture microdissected tissue (for microdissection of tissues embedded in paraffin, the sections must be deparaffinized prior to microdissection). Genomic DNA may be extracted using a variety of commercially available methods such as the QIAmp DNA mini-kit (QIAGEN). Fixation of tissues can introduce sequence variations and reduce overall DNA quality. When studying such tissues, prior examination of the DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis will help determine the DNA quality. The amplified DNA produced is suitable for a range of downstream genetic assays and thus has the potential for use not only in academic research, but also in commercial, forensic, and diagnostic laboratories.
SCOMP was first reported by Klein et al. (1999) for the genetic analysis of single cells. For more information about genetic analysis using genomic representation, see Lucito et al. (1998). Protocols for Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG), and GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification are also available.
MATERIALS
Reagents
Agarose (Sigma)
ATP (Roche)
DNA size marker (100-bp ladder; Invitrogen)
dNTP mix (10 mM; 2.5 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP) (Invitrogen)
Ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL; Sigma)
Expand Long Template PCR system (3.5 U/µL; Roche)
This includes Expand Long Template Buffer 1 and Expand Long Template Polymerase. Other PCR systems designed for high-fidelity PCR may be used in this protocol but have not been tested.
Genomic DNA (5 ng/µL)
If purified genomic DNA is used, the concentration can be in the range of 10-100 ng/mL.
H2O (nuclease-free; Promega)
MseI (20 U/µL; New England Biolabs)
Oligonucleotides:
One-Phor-All Buffer Plus (GE Healthcare)
Orange loading dye (6X; Fermentas)
QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN)
T4 DNA ligase (5 U/µL; Roche)
TBE buffer (1X diluted from a 10X stock at pH 8; may also be obtained from Sigma)
Equipment
Electrophoresis apparatus
Heating block or water bath preset to 37°C and 65°C
Microcentrifuge
Pipettes for mixing solutions
Spectrophotometer
Thermal cycler
Ultracentrifuge
METHOD
Prepare at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied.
Restriction Enzyme Digestion of Template Genomic DNA
If several SCOMP reactions are going to be generated for subsequent analysis (i.e., more than 2-3 µg is required), perform a larger volume digestion (Step 1), and aliquot it prior to Step 5.
| ||||||||
The 3 µL of template can be added directly after proteinase K inactivation without any purification. This is useful if the DNA has been laser-capture microdissected or when the entire amount of template is expected to be extremely limited (<100 ng).
A negative control using 3 µL of purified H2O should also be used to monitor for contamination. If desired, a positive control using 10 ng of good-quality genomic DNA may also be used to monitor successful PCR. See Troubleshooting.
SCOMP Adaptor Ligation
| ||||||||
Prepare an adaptor for each sample from Step 4, including the negative control.
|
SCOMP PCR Amplification
| ||||||||
Assessment, Cleaning, and Quantification of PCR Products
TROUBLESHOOTING
Problem: There is amplification in the negative control.
[Step 13.ii]
Solution: Due to the manipulation of PCR products in all PCR-based WGA methods, the reactions can easily be contaminated. If negative controls produce a DNA smear, several steps can be tried to eliminate this:
Problem: Unpredictable amplification is observed.
[Step 13.ii]
Solution: A positive control (such as starting with 50 ng of good-quality genomic DNA) can be used to ensure that the reaction is working optimally. In addition:
Problem: The amplification smear contains smaller DNA fragments than expected.
[Step 13.ii]
Solution: The efficiency of amplification is dependent on the quality of the starting DNA, and the size of the amplification products is also template-dependent. Tissue fixation causes degradation of template DNA within the sample. If the template is degraded, as is DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, the smear will be smaller in size. Unfortunately, there is no way of improving this; thus care must be taken when using such products for downstream applications, because there may be more bias in these samples. Although PCR-based WGA is tolerant to mild or moderate DNA degradation and will amplify DNA with an average length of ~200 bp, in this case it is essential to use increased quantities of starting DNA (100 ng) to guarantee a satisfactory yield of final product. Moderate to severe degradation will reduce WGA efficiency and subsequently decrease the quality of results obtained in downstream applications.
Problem: There is insufficient DNA for downstream reactions.
[Step 15]
Solution: Combining at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied is recommended, as this has produced better results in downstream experiments.
Problem: Unpredictable results are obtained from downstream applications.
Solution: Successful PCR-based WGA and successful downstream results depend on the quality of starting DNA. For instance, if there is ineffective PCR amplification of a specific control gene with nonamplified DNA, negative results after WGA are to be expected. If using laser-capture microdissected material, a standard control PCR and a PCR using DNA from non-laser-capture microdissected tissue should be performed prior to WGA. In some cases, it may be necessary to try different amounts of amplified DNA in downstream PCR amplification procedures, for example, 12, 25, 50, and 100 ng.
DISCUSSION
The PCR products resulting from SCOMP have been used for several downstream applications, including chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) (Klein et al. 1999), array CGH (Ghazani et al. 2006), loss of heterozygosity (Klein et al. 1999) analysis, and direct sequencing (Klein et al. 1999). Both chromosomal CGH and array CGH analysis require the SCOMP products to be labeled in an additional reaction with appropriate dyes. When using SCOMP products for a comparative analysis (test and control), it is essential to treat both the DNA of interest and the control genomic DNA in the same manner. Because SCOMP reduces the genome to only a representation, it is important that control DNA is also a representation and that the control DNA be of similar quality to the DNA of interest. For example, if the DNA of interest was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, then the control "normal" DNA should also be from this source and preferably from the same patient. Pooling several replicate SCOMP reactions from the same sample may also help to reduce any bias that may be introduced in the PCR amplification step.
REFERENCES
Ghazani, A.A., Arneson, N.C., Warren, K., and Done, S.J. 2006. Limited tissue fixation times and whole genome amplification do not impact array CGH profiles. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 311–315.
Klein, C.A., Schmidt-Kittler, O., Schardt, J.A., Pantel, K., Speicher, M.R., and Riethmüller, G. 1999. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 4494–4499.
Lucito, R., Nakimura, M., West, J.A., Han, Y., Chin, K., Jensen, K., McCombie, R., Gray, J.W., and Wigler, M. 1998. Genetic analysis using genomic representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 4487–4492.
Related Protocols
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Online ISSN: 1559-6095 Terms of Service |