Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4922

This Protocol
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioinformatics/Genomics, general
Right arrow Genetics, general
Right arrow Genetic Variation
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow DNA Sequencing
Right arrow Genomic DNA
Right arrow Libraries
Right arrow Libraries, general
Right arrow Genomic Libraries
Right arrow Genome Analysis
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrowRelated Protocols
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Legend icon

protocolProtocol

Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG)

Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done

This protocol was adapted from "PCR-Based Whole Genome Amplification," Chapter 18, in PCR (eds. Hughes and Moody). Scion Publishing Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.


INTRODUCTION

PCR-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) has the goal of generating microgram quantities of genome-representative DNA from picogram or nanogram amounts of starting material. This amplification should introduce little, or ideally no, representational bias. In contrast to other techniques for WGA, PCR-based methods are generally less affected by DNA quality and are more applicable to DNA extracted from various sources (fixed and fresh tissues). Ligation-mediated PCR techniques involve ligating an adaptor sequence onto a "representation" of DNA molecules, generated following enzymatic digestion, random shearing, or chemical cleavage. Adaptor-ligation PCR of randomly sheared genomic DNA (PRSG), described here, is based on ligation-mediated PCR and was designed to improve genome coverage. Rather than using enzymatically generated fragments, this method uses randomly fragmented DNA as the template. The process involves three steps: (1) the hydrodynamic shearing of genomic DNA to a 0.5-2-kb size range, (2) end filling and adaptor ligation, and (3) high-stringency PCR for faithful replication of the resulting fragments.


RELATED INFORMATION

When implementing WGA in the laboratory, it is important to assess the entire experimental process closely, including sample collection, fixation, storage, and initial DNA extraction procedures, as all of these factors can affect DNA quality and thus have some bearing on the selection of the WGA technique. When using WGA, it is important first to validate the method selected and to become proficient in the technique before applying it to actual samples. Irrespective of the method selected, it is essential to establish that the results generated from the amplified DNA are indistinguishable from the results obtained from the original genomic DNA.

The DNA that can be amplified by PCR-based WGA includes DNA extracted from fixed, frozen, or archival tissue; whole blood; buccal swabs; single cells; sorted chromosomes; and laser-capture microdissected tissue (for microdissection of tissues embedded in paraffin, the sections must be deparaffinized prior to microdissection). Genomic DNA may be extracted using a variety of commercially available methods such as the QIAmp DNA mini-kit (QIAGEN). Fixation of tissues can introduce sequence variations and reduce overall DNA quality. When studying such tissues, prior examination of the DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis will help determine the DNA quality. The amplified DNA produced is suitable for a range of downstream genetic assays and thus has the potential for use not only in academic research, but also in commercial, forensic, and diagnostic laboratories.

PRSG was first reported by Tanabe et al. (2003). An assessment of the genome reproducibility provided by PRSG showed a failure rate of PCR of <1% when PRSG products were generated from high-quality DNA. However, the PCR failure rate increased (ranged from 30% to 50%) and was sample-dependent when poor-quality genomic DNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples was tested.

Protocols for Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Single-Cell Comparative Genomic Hybridization PCR (SCOMP), and GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification are also available.


MATERIALS

Reagents

Agarose (Sigma)

recipe caution Ammonium acetate (7.5 M)

ATP (10 mM; Invitrogen)

BAL31 nuclease (4 U/µL) and accompanying 2X reaction buffer (Fermentas)

DNA size marker (100-bp ladder; Invitrogen)

Ethanol

caution Ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL; Sigma)

Genomic DNA (up to 1 µg)

Glycogen (20 µg/mL; Invitrogen)

H2O (nuclease-free; Promega)

caution Isopropanol

Oligonucleotides:

Adaptor 1: 5'-AATTCGGCGGCCGCGGATCC-3' (100 µM)

Adaptor 2: 5'-GCCGCCGGCGCCTAGG-3' (100 µM)

ER-1 PCR primer: 5'-GGAATTCGGCGGCCGCGGATCC-3' (100 µM)

One-Phor-All Buffer Plus (GE Healthcare)

Orange loading dye (6X; Fermentas)

caution Phenol:chloroform

Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µL) and accompanying 10X PCR buffer (Invitrogen)

T4 DNA ligase (5 U/µL) and accompanying 5X ligase buffer (Invitrogen)

T4 DNA polymerase (5 U/µL) and the accompanying 5X reaction buffer (Invitrogen)

recipe TBE buffer (1X diluted from a 10X stock at pH 8; may also be obtained from Sigma)

recipe TE buffer (1X; pH 7.5)

Equipment

Electrophoresis apparatus

Hydrodynamic shearing machine (e.g., HydroShear; GeneMachines)

The HydroShear machine uses a ruby with a 0.05-mm diameter hole to shear the DNA, an approach specific to this piece of equipment. Alternative machines or methods that generate DNA fragments within the desired size range (0.5-2 kb) will likely yield comparable results.


METHOD

Prepare at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied.

DNA Shearing

If the genomic DNA is already degraded, such as that obtained from laser-capture microdissected tissues, the procedure can be started at Step 4.

1. Shear 1 µg (200 µL) of high-molecular-weight genomic DNA using an automated hydrodynamic shearing machine, according to the supplier’s instructions (Thorstenson et al. 1998).
We used the HydroShear machine to randomly fragment the DNA solution (200 µL) at appropriate flow rates (speed codes 4 or 5) for 20 iterations.
See Troubleshooting.

2. Purify the solution of randomly fragmented DNA using phenol:chloroform, as described in Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform.

3. Add 1 mL of glycogen, 0.5 volumes of 7.5 M ammonium acetate, and 2.5 volumes of 100% isopropanol to the sample and precipitate the DNA as described in Standard Ethanol Precipitation of DNA in Microcentrifuge Tubes. Dissolve the pellet in 10 µL of TE buffer.

BAL31 Treatment of DNA

4. Mix 5 µL (~500 ng) of DNA solution from Step 3 with 50 µL of BAL31 reaction buffer, and incubate for 5 min at 70°C, followed by 5 min at 30°C.

5. Add 1 µL of BAL31 nuclease, and incubate for 1 min at 30°C.

6. Purify the DNA fragments by phenol:chloroform extraction (see Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform), and dissolve the pellet in 7 µL of TE buffer.

End-Filling

7. Add 2 µL of T4 DNA polymerase buffer to the DNA from Step 6. Incubate the solution for 5 min at 70°C and then for 5 min at 30°C.

8. Add 1 µL of T4 DNA polymerase and incubate for 5 min at 37°C.

9. Purify the DNA fragments by phenol:chloroform extraction (see Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform), and dissolve the pellet in 25 µL of TE.

PRSG Ligation of Adaptors and PCR Amplification

10. Prepare adaptor complexes by combining the following reagents:
0.5 µL One-Phor-All Buffer Plus
0.5 µL Adaptor oligonucleotide 1
0.5 µL Adaptor oligonucleotide 2
Add nuclease-free H2O to a final reaction volume of 3 µL.

11. To form the adaptor complexes, incubate the sample using a step-down program on a thermal cycler going from 65°C to 15°C, ramping at 1°C/min.

12. Ligate the adaptors to the DNA fragments:
i. Combine the following reagents:
1 µL (20 ng) DNA solution from Step 9
4 µL T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer
1 µL Pre-formed adaptors from Step 11
1 µL ATP
12 µL Nuclease-free H2O
1 µL T4 DNA ligase

ii. Incubate for 12 h at 16°C.
13. Perform PCR amplification as follows:
i. Combine the following reagents:
1 µL (1 ng) Adaptor-ligated DNA mixture from Step 12.ii
77 µL Nuclease-free H2O
10 µL 10X PCR buffer
1 µL ER-1 primer
10 µL dNTP mix
1 µL Platinum Taq DNA polymerase

ii. Carry out the following cycling program:
Number of cycles Temperature Time

15-20 94°C 1 min
72°C 3 min
1 72°C 10 min

Some DNA fragments have a high GC content and may form a stable secondary structure, which often prevents PCR amplification at a standard annealing temperature of 50°C-60°C. However, by using an adaptor in conjunction with a high annealing temperature (72°C), the amplification bias during PCR due to differences in template sequence composition can be minimized. This, in turn, allows better genome coverage.

14. Aliquot the sample into five separate tubes (20 µL each) and add:
58 µL Nuclease-free H2O
10 µL 10X PCR buffer
1 µL ER-1 primer
10 µL dNTP mix
1 µL Platinum Taq DNA polymerase

15. PCR-amplify each aliquot for an additional five to 10 cycles using the PCR cycling conditions given in Step 13.ii.
To obtain sufficient yields of DNA, using a high-cycle-number PCR is not recommended, because this may introduce sequence bias caused by mispriming and preferential amplification of shorter fragments. Split the first PCR five ways after the initial 15-20 cycles, and then perform an additional five to 10 cycles on each aliquot.

16. Purify the DNA fragments by phenol:chloroform extraction followed by isopropanol precipitation as described in Steps 2 and 3. Dissolve the DNA pellet in 100 µL of TE buffer.
Other DNA purification kits may be a suitable substitute for phenol extraction.

17. Determine the size of the products as follows:
i. Mix 5 µL of the reaction mix with 1 µL of 6X orange loading dye solution.

ii. Resolve the aliquot by Agarose Gel Electrophoresis using a 1% agarose gel containing 20 µg of ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) per 100 mL of agarose, alongside a DNA size marker.
The expected yield of products is 5-10 µg, ranging in size from 0.4 to 1.5 kb.
See Troubleshooting.


TROUBLESHOOTING

Problem: Sample processing (i.e., DNA shearing) is inefficient.

[Step 1]

Solution: Of all the processes involved in PRSG, DNA shearing is the most time-consuming, and hence the processing of multiple samples is best carried out using an automated system. When performing automated hydrodynamic shearing with the HydroShear, avoid using samples containing >5 µg of DNA, insoluble DNA, or other contaminants, because the small hole in the ruby of the HydroShear is easily blocked. If using an alternative approach to the HydroShear, first perform the protocol using a DNA sample for which results are known.

Problem: There is amplification in the negative control.

[Step 17.ii]

Solution: Due to the manipulation of PCR products in all PCR-based WGA methods, the reactions can easily be contaminated. If negative controls produce a DNA smear, several steps can be tried to eliminate this:

Problem: Unpredictable amplification is observed.

[Step 17.ii]

Solution: A positive control (such as starting with 50 ng of good-quality genomic DNA) can be used to ensure that the reaction is working optimally. In addition:

Problem: The amplification smear contains smaller DNA fragments than expected.

[Step 17.ii]

Solution: The efficiency of amplification is dependent on the quality of the starting DNA, and the size of the amplification products is also template-dependent. Tissue fixation causes degradation of template DNA within the sample. If the template is degraded, as is DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, the smear will be smaller in size. Unfortunately, there is no way of improving this; thus care must be taken when using such products for downstream applications, because there may be more bias in these samples. Although PCR-based WGA is tolerant to mild or moderate DNA degradation and will amplify DNA with an average length of ~200 bp, in this case it is essential to use increased quantities of starting DNA (100 ng) to guarantee a satisfactory yield of final product. Moderate to severe degradation will reduce WGA efficiency and subsequently decrease the quality of results obtained in downstream applications.

Problem: There is insufficient DNA for downstream reactions.

[Step 17.ii]

Solution: Combine at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied, as this has produced better results in downstream experiments.

Problem: Unpredictable results are obtained from downstream applications.

Solution: Successful PCR-based WGA and successful downstream results depend on the quality of starting DNA. For instance, if there is ineffective PCR amplification of a specific control gene with nonamplified DNA, negative results after WGA are to be expected. If using laser-capture microdissected material, perform a standard control PCR and a PCR using DNA from nonlaser-capture microdissected tissue prior to WGA. In some cases, it may be necessary to try different amounts of amplified DNA in downstream PCR amplification procedures, for example, 12, 25, 50, and 100 ng.


DISCUSSION

PRSG has been used successfully for single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, microsatellite analysis, Southern blotting, and array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In an analysis of 307 microsatellites distributed throughout the genome, 84% were reproducibly amplified in PRSG DNA, and of these, 99% showed a consistent pattern between the PRSG product and the original genomic DNA (Tanabe et al. 2003). Array CGH experiments using an esophageal cancer cell line, TE6, showed >90% concordance of the fluorescence ratios between the PRSG-amplified and matched nonamplified DNA (Tanabe et al. 2003).


REFERENCES

Tanabe, C., Aoyagi, K., Sakiyama, T., Kohno, T., Yanagitani N. Akimoto, S., Sakamoto, M., Sakamoto, H., Yokota, J., Ohki, M., et al. 2003. Evaluation of a whole-genome amplification method based on adaptor-ligation PCR of randomly sheared genomic DNA. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 38: 168–176.[Medline]

Thorstenson, Y.R., Hunicke-Smith, S.P., Oefner, P.J., and Davis, R.W. 1998. An automated hydrodynamic process for controlled, unbiased DNA shearing. Genome Res. 8: 848–855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Protocols

Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4455. [Extract] [Full Text]

Standard Ethanol Precipitation of DNA in Microcentrifuge Tubes
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4456. [Extract] [Full Text]

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4020. [Extract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4919. [Abstract] [Full Text]

GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4920. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4921. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Single-Cell Comparative Genomic Hybridization PCR (SCOMP)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4923. [Abstract] [Full Text]