Please cite as: CSH Protocols; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4920

This Protocol
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Done, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow DNA Sequencing
Right arrow Genomic DNA
Right arrow Libraries
Right arrow Libraries, general
Right arrow Genomic Libraries
Right arrow Genome Analysis
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrow Bioinformatics/Genomics, general
Right arrow Genetics, general
Right arrow Genetic Variation
Right arrowRelated Protocols
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Scion Methods Express Manuals

protocolProtocol

GenomePlex Whole-Genome Amplification

Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done

This protocol was adapted from "PCR-Based Whole Genome Amplification," Chapter 18, in PCR (eds. Hughes and Moody). Scion Publishing Ltd., Oxfordshire, UK, 2007.


INTRODUCTION

PCR-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) has the goal of generating microgram quantities of genome-representative DNA from picogram or nanogram amounts of starting material. This amplification should introduce little, or ideally no, representational bias. In contrast to other techniques for WGA, PCR-based methods are generally less affected by DNA quality and are more applicable to DNA extracted from various sources (fixed and fresh tissues). GenomePlex WGA, described in this protocol, is a proprietary amplification technology based on nonenzymatic random fragmentation of genomic DNA. The protocol involves conversion of the genome into an in vitro molecular library of DNA fragments, followed by incubation at various temperatures to add adaptor sequences with specific PCR priming sites to both ends of every fragment. The fragment library can then be amplified several 1000-fold to generate milligram quantities of DNA starting with as little as 10-100 ng.


RELATED INFORMATION

When implementing WGA in the laboratory, it is important to assess the entire experimental process closely, including sample collection, fixation, storage, and initial DNA extraction procedures, as all of these factors can affect DNA quality and thus have some bearing on the selection of the WGA technique. When using WGA, it is important first to validate the method selected and to become proficient in the technique before applying it to actual samples. Irrespective of the method selected, it is essential to establish that the results generated from the amplified DNA are indistinguishable from the results obtained from the original genomic DNA.

The DNA that can be amplified by PCR-based WGA includes DNA extracted from fixed, frozen, or archival tissue; whole blood; buccal swabs; single cells; sorted chromosomes; and laser-capture microdissected tissue (for microdissection of tissues embedded in paraffin, the sections must be deparaffinized prior to microdissection). Genomic DNA may be extracted using a variety of commercially available methods such as the QIAmp DNA mini-kit (QIAGEN). Fixation of tissues can introduce sequence variations and reduce overall DNA quality. When studying such tissues, prior examination of the DNA by agarose gel electrophoresis will help determine the DNA quality. The amplified DNA produced is suitable for a range of downstream genetic assays and thus has the potential for use not only in academic research, but also in commercial, forensic, and diagnostic laboratories.

Protocols for Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR), Whole-Genome Amplification by Single-Cell Comparative Genomic Hybridization PCR (SCOMP), and Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG) are also available.


MATERIALS

Reagents

Agarose (Sigma)

DNA size marker (100-bp ladder; Invitrogen)

caution Ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL; Sigma)

Genomic DNA (1-10 ng/µL)

GenomePlex Whole Genome Amplification kit (Sigma)

The GenomePlex kit was originally developed by Rubicon Genomics but is now available from Sigma. The constituents of the GenomePlex WGA kit buffers are proprietary and are therefore unknown.

The kit includes 10X Fragmentation buffer, 1X Library Preparation buffer, Library Stabilization solution, Library Preparation enzyme, and 10X Amplification Master Mix.

H2O (nuclease-free) (Promega)

Orange loading dye (6X) (Fermentas)

caution Phenol:chloroform or PCR purification kit (see Step 15)

Taq DNA polymerase (JumpStart; Sigma)

It is strongly recommended to use the JumpStart or BD TITANIUM Taq DNA polymerase, as both have been optimized for use with the GenomePlex kit. Other sources of Taq DNA polymerase may not produce optimal results.

recipe TBE buffer (1X diluted from a 10X stock at pH 8; may also be obtained from Sigma)

Equipment

Centrifuge

Electrophoresis apparatus

Ice

Spectrophotometer

Thermal cycler

caution UV light

Vortex mixer or pipettes for mixing solutions


METHOD

GenomePlex Fragmentation

1. Combine the following reagents, and mix by pipetting or brief vortexing:
10 µL (10-100 ng final concentration) DNA sample
1 µL 10X Fragmentation buffer (blue-capped tube in the GenomePlex Whole Genome Amplification kit)

Users should prepare at least two GenomePlex reactions for each sample, as this will provide a greater yield of DNA. In addition, better results have been obtained in downstream applications when the products from at least two reactions are combined.
When handling many samples (>20), use multiwell strips or 96-well PCR plates, as this will help decrease the set-up time. However, caution must be taken when removing the strip caps to avoid cross-contamination of tube contents. For 96-well plates, use adhesive metal or plastic films. The advantage of these (vs. strip caps) is that they do not need to be removed and can be pierced using a pipette tip to allow the addition of the Library Preparation solution (Step 4). The plate can then be resealed by placing a second film over the top of the first film.

2. Consolidate the sample by centrifugation (5-10 sec), and incubate for 4 min at 95°C in a thermal cycler.
As stated by Sigma in the manual for the GenomePlex kit, adhering to this incubation time is essential, as longer or shorter times can affect results. In our experience, however, if degraded DNA is used, decreasing the fragmentation time in 30-sec increments can improve results.

3. Cool the sample for 5 min on ice.

Library Preparation

4. Add 2 µL of 1X Library Preparation buffer (green-capped tube) and 1 µL of Library Stabilization solution (yellow-capped tube) to each sample. Mix the sample by pipetting or brief vortexing.

5. Consolidate the sample by centrifugation (5-10 sec), and incubate for 2 min at 95°C in a thermal cycler.

6. Cool the sample for 5 min on ice, and consolidate by centrifugation (5-10 sec).

7. Add 1 µL of Library Preparation enzyme (orange-capped tube), mix by pipetting or vortexing, and centrifuge briefly.

8. Incubate the samples in a thermal cycler using the following conditions:
Temperature Time

16°C 20 min
24°C 20 min
37°C 20 min
75°C 5 min

9. Store the reaction mixtures for up to 3 d at –20°C, or continue with PCR amplification.
The effect of long-term storage on WGA DNA and subsequent downstream applications has not been assessed.

GenomePlex PCR Amplification

10. Per reaction, combine the following reagents:
7.5 µL 10X Amplification Master Mix (red-capped tube)
47.5 µL Sterile H2O
5 µL JumpStart Taq DNA polymerase
15 µL Library preparation (from Step 9)

11. Mix the reaction constituents thoroughly by pipetting or vortexing, and centrifuge briefly.

12. Use the following PCR profile for amplification:
Number of cycles Temperature Time

1 95°C 3 min
14 94°C 15 sec
65°C 5 min

If more than one reaction has been set up for each sample (which is recommended), combine reactions after amplification.

13. Determine the size of the products as follows:
i. Mix 5 µL of the reaction mix with 1 µL of 6X orange loading dye solution.

ii. Resolve the aliquot by Agarose Gel Electrophoresis using a 1% agarose gel containing 20 µg of ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) per 100 mL of agarose, beside a DNA size marker.

iii. Detect the DNA smears under UV light.
The size of the amplification product is dependent on the quality of the starting DNA. If high-molecular-weight DNA (extracted from fresh tissue or cells) was used, the amplification product smear will range from 50 to 2000 bp. However, if low-molecular-weight DNA (from fixed tissue) was used, the size of the amplification product smear will generally be <500 bp.
See Troubleshooting.
14. Store the reaction mixtures at –20°C prior to purification.

15. Clean the GenomePlex WGA products to remove unincorporated primers and other reaction constituents that may interfere with downstream applications.
Any PCR product clean-up method is acceptable, including the MinElute 96 UF PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN), QIAquick PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN), DNA Clean & Concentrator 5 (Genetix), Microcon YM-30 Centrifugal Filter Unit (Millipore), or phenol:chloroform extraction (see Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform).

16. Quantitate the GenomePlex WGA products using spectrophotometry.
See Troubleshooting.


TROUBLESHOOTING

Problem: There is amplification in the negative control.

[Step 13.iii]

Solution: Owing to the manipulation of PCR products in all PCR-based WGA methods, the reactions can easily be contaminated. If negative controls produce a DNA smear, several steps can be tried to eliminate this:

Problem: Unpredictable amplification is observed.

[Step 13.iii]

Solution: A positive control (i.e., starting with 50 ng of good-quality genomic DNA) can be used to ensure that the reaction is working optimally. In addition:

Problem: The amplification smear contains smaller DNA fragments than expected.

[Step 13.iii]

Solution: The efficiency of amplification is dependent on the quality of the starting DNA, and the size of the amplification products is also template-dependent. Tissue fixation causes degradation of template DNA within the sample. If the template is degraded, as is DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, the smear will be smaller in size. Unfortunately, there is no way of improving this; thus care must be taken when using such products for downstream applications, because there may be more bias in these samples. Although PCR-based WGA is tolerant to mild or moderate DNA degradation and will amplify DNA with an average length of approximately 200 bp, in this case it is essential to use increased quantities of starting DNA (100 ng) to guarantee a satisfactory yield of final product. Moderate to severe degradation will reduce WGA efficiency and subsequently decrease the quality of results obtained in downstream applications.

Problem: There is insufficient DNA for downstream reactions.

[Step 16]

Solution: Combine at least two individual WGA amplifications for each DNA to be studied, as this produces better results in downstream experiments.

Problem: Unpredictable results are obtained from downstream applications.

Solution: Successful PCR-based WGA and successful downstream results depend on the quality of starting DNA. For instance, if there is ineffective PCR amplification of a specific control gene with nonamplified DNA, negative results after WGA are to be expected. If using laser-capture microdissected material, perform a standard control PCR and a PCR using DNA from nonlaser-capture microdissected tissue prior to WGA. In some cases, it may be necessary to try different amounts of amplified DNA in downstream PCR amplification procedures, for example, 12, 25, 50, and 100 ng.


DISCUSSION

When using GenomePlex for region-specific PCR, we have found the ideal range of PCR size to be 100-600 bp. If GenomePlex is used with DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, it is likely that this range will be smaller. Microsatellite analysis of GenomePlex products worked well in our hands for tri- and tetranucleotide repeats, but the amplification of dinucleotide repeats did not demonstrate concordance between the amplified and nonamplified samples. The use of GenomePlex to amplify DNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue provides good array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results (Little et al. 2006). Concordance is 99.89% when compared with nonamplified DNA, determined using the Illumina single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) platform (Barker et al. 2004). However, SNP genotyping using the Affymetrix experimental protocol is not recommended for GenomePlex WGA products (data not shown) because of poor results. This is likely due to the loss of XbaI restriction sites required for the protocol, although this has yet to be tested.


REFERENCES

Barker, D.L., Hansen, M.S., Faruqi, A.F., Giannola, D., Irsula, O.R., Lasken, R.S., Latterich, M., Makarov, V., Oliphant, A., Pinter, J.H., et al. 2004. Two methods of whole-genome amplification enable accurate genotyping across a 2320-SNP linkage panel. Genome Res. 14: 901–907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Little S.E, Vuononvirta, R., Reis-Filho, J.S., Natrajan, R., Iravani, M., Fenwick, K., Mackay, A., Ashworth, A., Pritchard-Jones, K., and Jones, C. 2006. Array CGH using whole genome amplification of fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor DNA. Genomics 87: 298–306.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Protocols

Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4455. [Extract] [Full Text]

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
Joseph Sambrook and David W. Russell
CSH Protocols 2006: 4020. [Extract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Degenerate Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (DOP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4919. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Improved Primer Extension Preamplification PCR (I-PEP-PCR)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4921. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Adaptor-Ligation PCR of Randomly Sheared Genomic DNA (PRSG)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4922. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Whole-Genome Amplification by Single-Cell Comparative Genomic Hybridization PCR (SCOMP)
Nona Arneson, Simon Hughes, Richard Houlston, and Susan Done
CSH Protocols 2008: 4923. [Abstract] [Full Text]