Please cite as: CSH Protocols; 2007; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4894
| Protocol |
1 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
2 Department of Biology, Biological Imaging Center 139-74, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
3Corresponding author (rusty{at}caltech.edu)
INTRODUCTION
The transfection of GFP-expressing constructs into early embryos permits key developmental events such as gastrulation to be dynamically imaged using time-lapse video-microscopy. This protocol describes the ex ovo electroporation of a DNA plasmid into avian embryos as young as stage X, nearly 24 h earlier in development than most electroporation protocols. Compared to in ovo electroporation, the ex ovo method allows easier embryo orientation (the posterior half of the embryo is darker than the anterior half). Thus, positioning of the specimen and consistency of the electroporation site between embryos is improved. Furthermore, nearly all embryos can be electroporated at the same stage using the ex ovo method: If some embryos have not reached a desired stage, it is possible to temporally stop development of those embryos already at the desired stage by keeping them at room temperature while incubating the rest at 37°C until they develop. The method described here uses relatively low voltage, and the electroporation chamber can be made easily, with no specialized equipment required.
RELATED INFORMATION
This protocol was adapted from Cui et al. (2006) and incorporates the ex ovo culture method described by New (1955).
MATERIALS
Reagents
DNA plasmid of interest (e.g., GFP expression plasmid)
Store DNA plasmid stocks in endotoxin-free H2O.
DNA purification kit (endotoxin-free) (e.g., Qiagen EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kit, 12362)
Embryonic culture dish
Prepare by pouring 3 mL of agar substrate into a 35-mm Petri dish (Fisher Scientific, 0875711YZ) (Chapman et al. 2001).
Embryonic culture insert
Prepare by pouring 1 mL of agar substrate into a Millicell insert (Millipore Organotypic culture inserts, PICMORG-50).
Embryonic phosphate-buffered saline (ePBS) (1X)
Embryos from Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix coturnix japonica) or chicken eggs (unincubated or incubated to desired stage)
Early embryos in this protocol are staged according to Eyal-Giladi and Kochav (1976).
H2O, endotoxin-free
Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Mediatech/cellgro, 21-020-CV)
Nail polish (clear)
Clear nail polish acts as an electrical insulator.
Equipment
Coverslips (35 mm, No. 1), glass
Filter paper rings for embryo removal (see Step 8)
Forceps
Incubator at 37°C
Microcapillaries (1.0-mm O.D. with glass filament) (Narishige, GD-1)
Micromanipulators (2) (Narishige)
Petri dishes (60 mm) (BD Falcon, 353002)
Petri dishes (100 mm) (BD Falcon, 351029)
Picoliter injector (Harvard Instruments, PLI-100)
Platinum wires (3 x 0.35 mm and 80 x 0.3 mm)
Scissors, angled iris (Fine Science Tools, 14063-09)
Single-stage glass microelectrode puller (Narishige, PC10)
Square-pulse electroporator (BEX Co., Ltd., CUY-21TM)
Tissues
Transfer pipettes
METHOD
Construction of Electroporation Chamber
The use of a glass-bottomed chamber allows the precise placement of the specimen directly over the anode. The chamber is constructed such that the raised segment of the anode is bathed in electrolyte solution (HBSS) during electroporation. When the Millicell insert is centered over the glass window, the insert membrane touches the anode.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. A cross-section of the glass-bottomed electroporation chamber used to electroporate pre-gastrulation stage avian embryos. |
DNA Plasmid Preparation
Embryo Removal Using Paper Rings
This technique for isolating and securing chicken embryos on a paper ring is described by Chapman et al. (2001).
Electroporation of Embryos
With the use of Millicell inserts (in which the volume of agar substrate and thus the distance between the embryo and anode remain constant) as well as a glass-bottomed chamber (which allows the specimen to be placed directly over the anode), a specimen can be electroporated approximately every 3 min.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. A schematic showing the movement of the needle tip used to penetrate the vitelline membrane (V.M.) without damaging the epiblast. The top layer is the vitelline membrane and the lower layer is the epiblast. (A) The needle is lowered to press on the surface of the vitelline membrane. (B) The needle tip is moved to the left until a fold of vitelline membrane is formed over the needle tip. (C) The needle tip is lifted slightly to release the pressure on the epiblast, without losing the vitelline-membrane fold. (D) The needle tip is moved to the left to penetrate through the vitelline membrane. Steps B through D may be repeated until the needle tip penetrates the vitelline membrane. |
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. A schematic showing movement of the cathode for electroporation. Red indicates the injected DNA plasmid solution (with phenol red). Pink indicates the presence of electrolyte solution (HBSS). (A) After the application of one to two drops of HBSS, the cathode is lowered. (B) The cathode is lifted when tissue deformation is seen. (C) The cathode is held in position as soon as tissue deformation is no longer visible. V.M. is vitelline membrane. |
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. Images of GFP-expressing embryos 3.5 h post-electroporation. (A) Bright-field image of an avian embryo. (B) Enlarged fluorescent image (GFP) of the rectangle box in A, showing that fluorescently labeled cells on the right side of the embryo are sparser than those on the left side when different voltages were used (3 V on right side and 4 V on left side). (C) A small group of cells (~100) were fluorescently labeled when a small amount of plasmid DNA was pumped into the region. Scale bars: 250 µm in A, B, and C, and 50 µm in inset picture of C. |
DISCUSSION
This technique, together with time-lapse imaging methods, allows researchers to study how these fluorescently labeled cells move or change their shapes during gastrulation. The technique can be extended when other reagents are used to study functionality of certain genes. For example, a specific gene can be over-expressed, and/or ectopically expressed, by electroporating a plasmid encoding the gene of interest. Alternatively, the functionality of a specific ligand can be down-regulated with the electroporation of a plasmid encoding the dominant-negative receptor for the ligand. A morpholino can also be used to interfere with a targeted gene pathway.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded in part by the American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (0620105Z) to C.C. and the NIH NCRR (R21HD047347-01A2) to R.L.
REFERENCES
Chapman, S.C., Collignon, J., Schoenwolf, G.C., and Lumsden, A. 2001. Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev. Dyn. 220: 284–289.[Medline]
Cui, C., Lansford, R., Filla, M.B., Little, C.D., Cheuvront, T.J., and Rongish, B.J. 2006. Electroporation and EGFP labeling of gastrulating quail embryos. Dev. Dyn. 235: 2802–2810.[Medline]
Eyal-Giladi, H. and Kochav, S. 1976. From cleavage to primitive streak formation: A complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. I. General morphology. Dev. Biol. 49: 321–337.[Medline]
New, D.A.T. 1955. A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 3: 320–331.
Copyright © 2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Online ISSN: 1559-6095 Terms of Service |