Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2007; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4768

This Protocol
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagschal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Feil, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wagschal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Feil, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Antibodies, general
Right arrow Cell Biology, general
Right arrow Genetic Variation
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow DNA Modification/Epigenetics
Right arrow DNA Protein Interactions
Right arrow Immunoprecipitation
Right arrow Genome Analysis
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrowRelated Protocol
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Legend icon

protocolProtocol

PCR-Based Analysis of Immunoprecipitated Chromatin

Alexandre Wagschal, Katia Delaval, Maëlle Pannetier, Philippe Arnaud, and Robert Feil1

Institute of Molecular Genetics, CNRS and University of Montpellier, 34293 Montpellier, France

1Corresponding author (robert.feil{at}igmm.cnrs.fr)


INTRODUCTION

After chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), different PCR-based approaches can be used to determine how much DNA is precipitated at a locus of interest. Real-time PCR amplification is often the preferred technique. One can also use duplex PCR amplification, which is the coamplification of a fragment from the region of interest and a control fragment (e.g., the actin gene, or the tubulin gene). This approach allows for estimating relative levels of specific histone modifications along chromosomal domains. For allele-specific studies (for instance, on dosage-compensation mechanisms or on genomic imprinting), electrophoretic detection of single-strand conformation polymorphisms (SSCP) or similar strategies such as hot-stop PCR can differentiate PCR products that represent the silent allele from those amplified from the active allele. If a polymorphic restriction site is present in one allele and absent in the other, the method of choice is hot-stop PCR. If no polymorphic restriction sites are available, but there are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that distinguish the alleles of interest, the best approach is to separate the PCR products derived from the two different alleles using SSCP. In SSCP, it is possible to discriminate denatured PCR products derived from one allele or the other because the secondary structure of each single strand will be directly dependent on the sequence itself. Hence, in nondenaturing gel conditions, each single strand will migrate differently. These four PCR-based methodologies to analyze immunoprecipitated chromatin (real-time PCR, duplex PCR, hot-stop PCR, and SSCP) are presented here.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Protocol

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on Unfixed Chromatin from Cells and Tissues to Analyze Histone Modifications
Alexandre Wagschal, Katia Delaval, Maëlle Pannetier, Philippe Arnaud, and Robert Feil
CSH Protocols 2007: 4767. [Abstract] [Full Text]